CASE STUDY

Determined: Turning a Health Crisis into a Scholarship Movement

How a personal challenge became a participatory platform for health education and student opportunity

Dr. Kenn Dixon, LSSGB, APR
Founder and organizer of Determined Cycling

AT A GLANCE

20156Thousands> $1.5M
First organized tourTours completed by 2022Miles ridden for educationUpdated endowment outcome

Public milestones documented through 2022  |  Updated endowment outcome supplied for this case study

Executive Summary

Determined began with a physical limitation and became a platform for student opportunity. Military injuries had narrowed the exercise options available to me. After a health scare, cycling offered a practical way to rebuild strength. In 2015, that personal response became an organized ride from Dallas to San Antonio for the Seventh-day Adventist Church General Conference Session. By 2022, I had personally organized six tours, ridden thousands of miles, and helped raise more than $150,000 toward an education endowment.

The larger outcome was not a ride or even a campaign total. Determined created a way for people to participate in a shared mission. Cyclists trained and raised support. Schools adopted riders and followed their progress. Students welcomed them with rallies, banners, and lessons connected to the tour. Donors funded access to education. Sponsors and volunteers supplied resources. Satellite tracking let families, students, and organizers follow the journey while adding a layer of safety in areas without reliable cell coverage.

The initiative later exceeded its original $1.5 million goal, according to the updated campaign outcome provided for this case study. That result matters. But the deeper lesson is how they achieved it: they translated a private challenge into a public purpose, then designed it so many people could see themselves in the work. Determined demonstrates that a durable movement grows when a clear cause, a visible challenge, meaningful participation, sound operations, and measurable progress reinforce one another.

The Strategic Question

How can a personal health challenge become a credible, repeatable movement that mobilizes people around educational access? Determined answered that question by connecting two needs that might otherwise have remained separate: adults needed a compelling way to pursue health and community, while students needed financial pathways into Seventh-day Adventist education.

The Challenge Behind the Challenge

The visible challenge was physical. Injuries from my military service limited the kinds of exercise I could sustain. A later health scare made inaction a poor option. Cycling offered lower impact exercise, but simply buying a bicycle would not have created a movement. The strategic challenge was to give the activity a purpose larger than personal recovery.

Education provided that purpose because the issue was both personal and institutional. My own educational journey was uneven. I didn’t appreciate every opportunity when I was young, and financial constraints interrupted my time at Oakwood. Later, as a teacher, chaplain, youth pastor, education evangelist, and parent, I came to understand both the value of Christian education and the sacrifices families make to obtain it. That history gave the campaign emotional truth. I was not raising money for an abstract program. I was riding for students whose choices could be constrained by cost.

The Reframe

The breakthrough was to stop treating cycling as the end and use it as the organizing vehicle. The first tour, then called Tour de Youth, linked a demanding ride with a timely destination and a cause people already cared about. The name later evolved into Determined Cycling, but the core promise remained simple: we cycle for our health, and we ride for their future.

The Journey from Event to Movement

StageWhat happenedWhy it mattered
ConstraintMilitary injuries and a health scare narrowed viable exercise options.The effort began with a genuine problem, giving the story credibility and urgency.
Personal responseCycling became a workable path back to physical activity.A visible discipline replaced a private intention and made progress observable.
2015 launchA group rode from Dallas to San Antonio during the General Conference Session.A personal practice became a shared challenge connected to a larger gathering.
ExpansionThe group organized tours for educational causes, including two fundraisers associated with Oakwood University.The model proved portable across institutions and communities.
2022 milestoneSix organized tours, thousands of miles, and more than $150,000 raised were publicly documented.Repeated execution demonstrated that the work was a platform, not a one-time stunt.
Endowment scaleThe campaign pursued a $1.5 million Texas Conference education endowment and later exceeded that amount.A finite event contributed to a long-term funding mechanism for student access.

Each stage reduced a different barrier. The original ride gave the idea visibility. Repetition created credibility. Institutional alignment connected the ride to a durable purpose. The endowment gave donors a long horizon. School and student participation made the mission tangible, and technology made the experience safer and easier to share.

How Participation Was Designed

Many fundraising events ask people to watch, applaud, and donate. Determined gave stakeholders distinct roles. That shift from audience to participant was the movement-building mechanism.

ParticipantRole in the movementValue created
CyclistsTrain, ride, fundraise, model healthy behavior, and represent an assigned school.Courage, visibility, peer invitation, and a human face for the cause.
SchoolsWelcome riders, organize rallies, communicate with families, and connect classrooms to the route.Local ownership and repeated touchpoints beyond a single event day.
StudentsTrack riders, create signs, attend greetings, and learn through tour-related activities.The beneficiaries become active participants rather than distant symbols.
DonorsSupport riders, sponsor the campaign, and contribute to the endowment.Personal connection to a visible effort and a lasting education outcome.
VolunteersSupport logistics, meals, lodging, communications, and route operations.Capacity and community hospitality across a multi-day tour.
Technology partnersProvide GPS visibility, satellite communication, and emergency capability.Safer operations plus a shared digital window into the journey.

Technology as Both Safety and Story

A multi-day cycling tour creates operational risk. Riders may travel several hundred miles, cross state lines, cover as many as 120 miles in a day, and pass through areas without dependable cellular service. For Determined, tracking could not be a novelty. It had to support real decisions.

Organizers used lightweight SPOT Trace devices mounted to bicycles, along with the SPOT My Globalstar mapping platform. The system provided near-real-time location visibility for organizers and a shareable view for students, sponsors, and supporters. SPOT X two-way satellite messengers added communication and SOS capability outside cellular coverage.

That technology served two strategic purposes at once. Operationally, it helped organizers know where riders were and offered an emergency communication option. Relationally, it allowed supporters to follow the route, anticipate arrivals, and greet cyclists with pep rallies, banners, and signs. The map turned distance into a shared experience. People who could not ride could still participate.

Preparedness Builds Trust

My Marine training shaped the approach. Long-distance cycling requires optimism, but it also requires redundancy, visibility, and preparation for the moment no one wants. As I explained in the Globalstar case study, the hope is never to use the SOS function; its value is knowing the connection is there if needed. Safety did more than protect the riders. It signaled that the campaign respected its participants and took stewardship seriously.

The Education Loop

The most distinctive element of Determined was how the ride entered schools’ lives. Riders were assigned to schools. Children and sponsors could follow their progress. Schools organized welcomes. Some classrooms incorporated the tour into curriculum by studying comparable events such as the Tour de France.

This created a reinforcing loop. The ride gave teachers a live subject. Classroom attention gave students a reason to follow. Student enthusiasm energized riders and donors. The riders brought the campaign back into communities. Those interactions generated stories, photos, conversation, and new invitations to participate. The fundraiser became an educational experience, and the educational experience strengthened the fundraiser.

Why the Model Worked

Authenticity. The origin story was true, specific, and connected to a recognizable need.

Mission alignment. Health, education, service, and faith were expressed through one visible act.

Narrative structure. A demanding journey created natural milestones, anticipation, and story tension.

Multiple entry points. People could ride, give, volunteer, host, teach, track, welcome, or sponsor.

Shared visibility. GPS tracking made progress observable and linked distant participants to the road.

Institutional durability. The endowment converted short-term energy into long-term educational capacity.

Results and Meaning

By May 2022, the public record documented six personally organized tours, thousands of miles ridden, and more than $150,000 raised during the two Texas Conference tours then completed. The campaign was working toward a $1.5 million endowment intended to provide scholarships for students who wanted a Christian education but needed additional financial help. The updated outcome supplied for this case study places the fund above $1.5 million.

The financial outcome is significant, but dollars alone understate the return. Determined also produced a network of relationships, a repeated event platform, a health witness, classroom engagement, sponsor value, volunteer experience, and a body of stories that made the cause visible. Those are not substitutes for money; they are the participation assets that helped money move.

The Determined Movement Model

The experience can be translated into a practical sequence for leaders who want to turn a personal challenge into a public cause.

1  Start with a real constraint
Name the lived problem honestly. Credibility begins before the campaign language.

2  Connect it to a mission
Link the personal response to an outcome that matters beyond the founder.

3  Create a visible challenge
Choose an action with milestones people can follow and a finish that means something.

4  Give stakeholders roles
Design meaningful ways to ride, give, host, teach, track, volunteer, and welcome.

5  Build for safety and trust
Treat logistics, communication, risk planning, and transparency as part of the message.

6  Convert attention into an asset
Use the event to build a fund, curriculum, relationships, and repeatable infrastructure.

7  Measure movement
Track both money raised and the people, behaviors, partnerships, and student outcomes created.

What Leaders Should Measure

A movement should not be evaluated by activity alone. A useful scorecard separates what the campaign produces from what changes because people participated.

LevelExamplesManagement question
InputsRiders, volunteers, routes, school partners, sponsors, communications, safety resourcesDid we assemble the capacity to execute responsibly?
EngagementMiles, donations, tracking views, rally attendance, classroom participation, inquiriesDid people interact with the campaign in meaningful ways?
OutcomesEndowment growth, scholarship access, repeat donors, returning riders, new partnerships, health behaviorDid participation create durable change for students and the community?

Leadership Lessons

Determined taught me that purpose becomes powerful when people can enter it. A founder may carry the original burden, but a movement grows only when the mission is no longer organized around the founder alone. The cyclist matters. The child holding the sign matters. The teacher turning the route into a lesson matters. The donor, volunteer, sponsor, driver, host, and safety partner all need to see how their action advances the same outcome.

It also taught me that technology works best when it strengthens a human relationship. The tracking map was valuable because it helped organizers protect people and helped students feel close to the riders. The device did not create the movement. It made participation safer, more visible, and easier to share.

Finally, Determined showed that a temporary event can serve a permanent purpose. The wheels stopped at the end of each tour, but the endowment was designed to keep working. That is the strategic move: use the urgency of a moment to build an asset that outlives the moment.

Conclusion

Determined did not begin as a master plan to raise more than $1.5 million. It began with the need to respond to injury and a warning about health. Cycling created a path forward. Education gave that path meaning. Participation gave it scale. Safety and tracking technology helped people trust and follow the journey. Repetition turned an event into a platform, and the endowment turned a platform into lasting capacity.

That is the central case: personal adversity can become public value when leaders connect an authentic story to a clear mission, design meaningful roles for others, and build a structure capable of carrying the energy beyond a single event. The strongest movements do more than ask people to support a cause. They help people become part of it.

Source Notes

Texas Conference of Seventh-day Adventists. The Cycling Pastor. May 4, 2022. Documents the 2015 launch, six tours, thousands of miles, more than $150,000 raised through two Texas Conference tours, and the stated $1.5 million endowment goal.

Globalstar. Marathon Cyclists Choose SPOT for Tracking and Safety. Documents school assignments, curriculum engagement, route conditions, SPOT Trace tracking, the shared mapping platform, SPOT X satellite communication, and SOS capability.

Updated campaign outcome. The statement that the education endowment surpassed $1.5 million was supplied by Kenn Dixon in the September 2026 case study brief. It is presented here as an updated project figure and is not attributed to the 2022 public profile.

Heroes Don’t Save Institutions. Teams Do.

Mature organizations have a senior leader everyone trusts. That is exactly the problem.

By the time an organization reaches maturity — a stable budget, a long-tenured leader, a board that has served together for years — it has usually developed a quiet, unspoken crisis plan. The plan is: the senior pastor will handle it. Or the executive director. Or the founder who is still in the building.

This is a particular kind of mistake. It confuses moral authority with operational capacity.

Senior leaders carry the institution’s spiritual authority. They are rarely the right person to monitor social media at 2 a.m., draft a statement while on the phone with the denomination’s legal office, and coordinate the review of that statement before it goes out. Mature organizations do not lack leaders. They lack teams — working units with defined roles, authority, and accountability that activate when the crisis hits.

A routine afternoon

You never know when an ordinary day will turn into a legal standoff. I once had to field an urgent call from an attorney representing a former pastor who had been accused of fraudulently registering a business name and signing vendor contracts under it. The lawyer was demanding board-voted documents from the new pastor right then and there.

I had to step in, firmly refer the attorney to the county courthouse for public records, and instruct him that all further legal inquiries had to go through our legal counsel. It was exactly the kind of moment that reveals whether an organization has a team or a hero. A hero improvises under pressure and hopes. A team knows its limits and knows who the legal liaison is before the phone rings.

The Crisis Communication Team

A Crisis Communication Team is not a committee that meets to admire the senior leader’s plan. Every member has a specific job that no one else is doing. For most mid-sized organizations, those jobs are:

  • Crisis Director — the single point of decision authority. Convenes the team, signs off on statements, makes the go/no-go calls.
  • Designated Spokesperson — the single public voice. Trained, calm, credible, available. Not necessarily the Crisis Director; sometimes the wisest move is to keep the senior leader away from the cameras.
  • Communication Lead — drafts statements, manages the press list, coordinates internal messaging.
  • Social Media Lead — monitors platforms in real time, posts approved content, flags trends.
  • Legal Liaison — reviews statements before release; advises on disclosure obligations.
  • Pastoral Care Coordinator — ensures victims, families, staff, and community receive direct human support. The institutional conscience of the team.
  • Documentation Lead — keeps the crisis log: every action, decision, and communication, with timestamps. Invisible until the after-action review, when it is invaluable.
  • Board Liaison — keeps governance informed at the right level without dragging the board into operational decisions it should not be making.
  • Denominational or Network Liaison — coordinates with the wider body. In connectional systems, this role is non-negotiable for any serious crisis.

Smaller organizations combine roles. Larger ones multiply them. What matters is that every function is owned.

Choose composure over credentials

The temptation in a mature organization is to give every job to the most professionally credentialed person available. Resist it. Crisis work is performed under acute stress, often in the middle of the night, often when emotions in the room are running high. The right people are not necessarily the most polished. They are the most composed, the most spiritually grounded, and the most reliable.

Look for spiritual maturity that will hold under pressure. Look for composure tested in scenario exercises — not assumed from a résumé or a pulpit performance. Look for diversity of perspective — age, gender, ethnicity, lay and clergy — because a team that all thinks alike will all miss the same things. Look for availability, including evenings, weekends, and the day you gather for worship. Crises do not respect the calendar.

The question mature organizations do not want to ask

Here is where maturity becomes a liability. Define, in writing, before the crisis: who can authorize a public statement? A press conference? An independent investigation? An emergency expenditure? These authorities should be located clearly enough that no one wastes time looking for permission at 2 a.m.

And then ask the question that long-tenured, well-loved leadership makes uncomfortable: What happens when the senior decision-maker is unavailable — or is the subject of the crisis?

The board chair should have standing authority to convene the team and act on behalf of the institution if the senior leader is implicated. This is not paranoia. It is prudence. The organizations most damaged by leadership scandal are almost always the ones where no one had the authority — or the courage — to act without the leader’s permission, because the leader had never been anything but trustworthy.

Build the escalation path while you still trust everyone. That is the only time it can be built.

Step 5: Practice

A team that has never trained together will not perform together. Tabletop exercises are the single highest-leverage investment a mature organization can make in its readiness. They do not require expensive consultants. They require a willing team, a realistic scenario, and an afternoon.

A workable annual rhythm: January, review the risk assessment and update the roster. March: run a tabletop on a financial or misconduct scenario. June, run a digital simulation on a social media escalation. September: review and update the holding statements. December, conduct the year-end readiness audit.

Heroes do not save institutions in crisis. Teams do. Build yours before you need it. Train it on a cadence. Clarify authority in writing. And within the next 30 days, send each person on your team a one-page memo outlining their role, training schedule, and after-hours contact expectations.

If a crisis broke this weekend, who would activate your team? Do they know they would?


This article draws on Chapter 3 of my book, Crisis, What Crisis? A Guide to Crisis Communication for Churches and Non-Profits. Next in this series: why leadership transitions are when your crisis plan quietly expires. To get the book, visit: https://books.by/drkenn-dixon

#CrisisCommunication #NonprofitLeadership #ChurchLeadership #BoardGovernance #LeadershipDevelopment